'Choices have consequences': Divorced dad plans family vacation, refuses to take 14 and 16-year-old kids because they sided with ex in custody dispute

Advertisement
  • 01

    Am I wrong for planning international travel without my children?

    a man and woman embrace in front of beachfront properties
  • 02
    So here's the reality. I have two kids. They are now 14 and 16. I've had 50/50 since I got divorced, up until a few months ago. 4 years ago, my ex wife got remarried and her husband advised her to start a custody dispute.
  • 03
    I spent $165,000 (basically my life savings) fighting for 4 years. For the record, my ex- wife's father is wealthy and paid all her legal fees. (This comes in to play later) The older child told the court appointed therapist "I want to live with mom and only see Dad every other weekend". The younger one just said they wanted to do 50/50.
  • 04
    The younger one then changed their mind and said: "Oh maybe 70/30 with Mom. I just want court stuff to be over." I went to trial. My attorney fought like hl, but the judge said: "Given the children's age, their preference will take precedence and we won't split them up, as it break their sibling bond."
  • 05
    black and white photo of two girls wearing sunglasses
  • 06
    Well, my wife and I have been planning some travel with some of her friends, her sister and their husbands. It includes 9 days in Spain and France. They picked the dates. We got tickets. The kids found out about it and have been asking me: "We want to go. Why can't we go?" I told my children: "This is something we planned. We saved for."
  • 07
    They asked if it was an adults only trip. I told them it was not, and their 15 year old cousin was coming. They said it was not fair we couldn't take them as they know we could afford it, and that it would be their only chance to travel internationally.
  • 08
    I told them: "You're young adults now. You chose to spend the majority of your time with your mother, and you got what you wanted. But choices have consequences. One of them is that you don't get to join me on things like this." They're both very upset. My younger one said: "You're just mad we have more fun at Mom's house." I'm afraid I'm being an a_h_le here. I'm happy to be wrong. But my gut is telling me what I'm doing is fair.
  • 09
    a closeup of a man smiling and stretching his arm
  • 10

    Commenters didn't feel that he was making his decision for the right reasons.

    Impossible_Rain_4727 YTA: You made it about their "choice" rather than their unavailability. You could have simply said "Your mother has court-ordered custody over you during the days of the trip. I can't change that". Instead you went the blame route. That is petty and assholish.
  • 11
    Don't blame your children for the difficult position you and your ex-wife placed them in. They didn't choose the breakdown of their parent's relationship.
  • 12
    gafftaped YTA for how you're handling this. Itd be fine to go without the children but the way you're handling it is incredibly petty. Youre only pushing your kids away more.
  • 13
    Naive_Pay_7066 I mean, if your goal is to further alienate your kids and worsen your relationship with them, nice work. You don't give any insight into why the kids wanted less time with you - they may have had valid reasons. With the limited info provided it's currently reading as YTA.
  • 14
    affictionitis Wow. So instead of examining your relationship with your children (14 and 16 are not "young adults") and maybe using this trip to strengthen your bond with them/repair any damage, you're getting petty revenge? I'm starting to see why they chose Mom. YTA.
  • 15
    Bubbly_Chicken_9358 It feels like you're trying to punish your kids for the custody battle with your ex. It is entirely up to you whether you invite them on this trip or not, but it feels like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
  • 16
    You spent your life savings because you wanted more parenting time. Now you have the opportunity to get more parenting time by taking them on a once- in-a-lifetime trip, and you're saying no... why? To make sure they know you're angry? You say in your explanation for why you may be the AH "Because I may be unintentionally treating my children definitely based on how they have treated me.".
  • 17
    First, your treatment of them is not 'unintentional'. You are angry and hurt and lashing out at them, which is, frankly, unfair. They are children. Your job is to be the adult. You are not doing that job very well.
  • 18
    Second, their treatment of you, I'm assuming, is your oldest saying they would prefer an every-other-weekend schedule, and that hurts you. Have you talked to them about it? Do you know why they made that choice? Or are you just pouting about it? Again, you are neither parenting them very well in this nor setting a good example for how adults behave.
  • 19
    This trip is going to be something your children remember for the rest of their lives. You get to decide how they remember it. They can either remember it as when Dad took them on an international trip and made great memories with them, or they can remember it as that time dad threw a temper tantrum over the custody schedule and went on a trip without them. ΥΤΑ.
  • 20
    rebcl You spent your life savings but can afford to travel with your kids internationally? YTA and this story doesn't line up
  • 21
    Current Echo3140 LL F them kids, amirite??? That's what they get for loving their MOM and not wanting to live with their loving and emotionally mature father (rich, btw)
  • 22
    drgrouchy YTA. You're taking out your animosity against your ex-wife out on your kids. Double a hole.
  • 23
    Icy-Willingness-8892 YTA - how is a cousin going? You are basically using the trip as a way to hurt your children for living with their mother. It's obvious that they have been the target of this kind of behavior before and didn't want to deal with an immature parent on top of everything else.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article